CTenaLouise
04-24-2008, 06:29 AM
There are definate Commonalities between Neurological Damage/ and Disease from Toxicity of mercury,and cadmium and pesticides and phthalates, etc.:
We can not TRUST the CDC - or FDA we must be human and use our own knowledge!
poison is deadly, we should not eat it, bathe in it, or spray food with it!
we should NOT put our lives or our childrens lives in th hands of seedy men/women
We should be better informed, so we must find the truth by researching it ourselves, like many have done Jenny McCarthy, and many of us who realize
we have been lied to, and lulled to sleep by bullcrapola...
this article for example deals in half truths -
you must click link to read entire article!
http://www.ens-newswire.com/ens/jul2005/2005-07-22-02.asp
As the report was released, the Washington, DC research and advocacy organization Environmental Working Group (EWG) asked the agency to begin testing the umbilical cord blood of newborn babies.
EWG also sent letters to 20 top chemical manufacturers asking them to release any internal tests to determine whether their products pollute babies.
The letters follow an investigative report that EWG released last week commissioning laboratory tests of 10 umbilical cord blood samples for the most extensive array of industrial chemicals, pesticides and other pollutants ever studied in newborns.
EWG found that the babies averaged 200 contaminants in their blood, including mercury, fire retardants, pesticides and the Teflon production chemical PFOA. In total, the babies' blood contained 287 chemicals, including 209 never before detected in cord blood. The study is available at
www.ewg.org/reports/bodyburden2.
http://archive.ewg.org/reports/bodyburden2/execsumm.php
Executive Summary
Body Burden — The Pollution in Newborns
A benchmark investigation of industrial chemicals, pollutants and pesticides in umbilical cord blood
Environmental Working Group, July 14, 2005
Summary. In the month leading up to a baby's birth, the umbilical cord pulses with the equivalent of at least 300 quarts of blood each day, pumped back and forth from the nutrient- and oxygen-rich placenta to the rapidly growing child cradled in a sac of amniotic fluid. This cord is a lifeline between mother and baby, bearing nutrients that sustain life and propel growth.
Not long ago scientists thought that the placenta shielded cord blood — and the developing baby — from most chemicals and pollutants in the environment. But now we know that at this critical time when organs, vessels, membranes and systems are knit together from single cells to finished form in a span of weeks, the umbilical cord carries not only the building blocks of life, but also a steady stream of industrial chemicals, pollutants and pesticides that cross the placenta as readily as residues from cigarettes and alcohol. This is the human "body burden" — the pollution in people that permeates everyone in the world, including babies in the womb.
In a study spearheaded by the Environmental Working Group (EWG) in collaboration with Commonweal, researchers at two major laboratories found an average of 200 industrial chemicals and pollutants in umbilical cord blood from 10 babies born in August and September of 2004 in U.S. hospitals. Tests revealed a total of 287 chemicals in the group. The umbilical cord blood of these 10 children, collected by Red Cross after the cord was cut, harbored pesticides, consumer product ingredients, and wastes from burning coal, gasoline, and garbage.
http://archive.ewg.org/reports/bodyburden2/execsumm.php
http://www.ens-newswire.com/ens/jul2005/2005-07-22-02.asp
"Chemical exposures during childhood can be far more harmful than those later in life
. Our cord blood findings above all raise the need for testing that ensures the safety of the widespread exposures we've documented that begin even before birth," Jane Houlihan, EWG's vice president for research, said.
"CDC is uniquely positioned and funded to respond to this need through its national body burden testing program, but CDC cannot test for all 80,000 industrial chemicals registered for use today," Houlihan said. "The companies that produce these chemicals have a responsibility to know if their products end up in babies, and to share what they learn with the public."
The American Chemistry Council, which represents the industry supports the biomonitoring studies, and agrees with the CDC's cautionary statement that the mere detection of a chemical does not necessarily indicate a risk to health.
"The information in the report should not be cause for undue concern," said the Council, "but a springboard for better understanding of exposure and - with more information - how the human body interacts with the environment."
The Third National Report on Human Exposure to Environmental Chemicals and an executive summary are available online at:
http://www.cdc.gov/exposurereport
http://www.ens-newswire.com/ens/jul2005/2005-07-22-02.asp
it starts to inform us -then it tells us not to be overly concerned? :eek:
so which is it? -see this is noninformation -read it yet do not worry we the government - we the CDC FDA -will tell you what to belive?
We can not TRUST the CDC - or FDA we must be human and use our own knowledge!
poison is deadly, we should not eat it, bathe in it, or spray food with it!
we should NOT put our lives or our childrens lives in th hands of seedy men/women
We should be better informed, so we must find the truth by researching it ourselves, like many have done Jenny McCarthy, and many of us who realize
we have been lied to, and lulled to sleep by bullcrapola...
this article for example deals in half truths -
you must click link to read entire article!
http://www.ens-newswire.com/ens/jul2005/2005-07-22-02.asp
As the report was released, the Washington, DC research and advocacy organization Environmental Working Group (EWG) asked the agency to begin testing the umbilical cord blood of newborn babies.
EWG also sent letters to 20 top chemical manufacturers asking them to release any internal tests to determine whether their products pollute babies.
The letters follow an investigative report that EWG released last week commissioning laboratory tests of 10 umbilical cord blood samples for the most extensive array of industrial chemicals, pesticides and other pollutants ever studied in newborns.
EWG found that the babies averaged 200 contaminants in their blood, including mercury, fire retardants, pesticides and the Teflon production chemical PFOA. In total, the babies' blood contained 287 chemicals, including 209 never before detected in cord blood. The study is available at
www.ewg.org/reports/bodyburden2.
http://archive.ewg.org/reports/bodyburden2/execsumm.php
Executive Summary
Body Burden — The Pollution in Newborns
A benchmark investigation of industrial chemicals, pollutants and pesticides in umbilical cord blood
Environmental Working Group, July 14, 2005
Summary. In the month leading up to a baby's birth, the umbilical cord pulses with the equivalent of at least 300 quarts of blood each day, pumped back and forth from the nutrient- and oxygen-rich placenta to the rapidly growing child cradled in a sac of amniotic fluid. This cord is a lifeline between mother and baby, bearing nutrients that sustain life and propel growth.
Not long ago scientists thought that the placenta shielded cord blood — and the developing baby — from most chemicals and pollutants in the environment. But now we know that at this critical time when organs, vessels, membranes and systems are knit together from single cells to finished form in a span of weeks, the umbilical cord carries not only the building blocks of life, but also a steady stream of industrial chemicals, pollutants and pesticides that cross the placenta as readily as residues from cigarettes and alcohol. This is the human "body burden" — the pollution in people that permeates everyone in the world, including babies in the womb.
In a study spearheaded by the Environmental Working Group (EWG) in collaboration with Commonweal, researchers at two major laboratories found an average of 200 industrial chemicals and pollutants in umbilical cord blood from 10 babies born in August and September of 2004 in U.S. hospitals. Tests revealed a total of 287 chemicals in the group. The umbilical cord blood of these 10 children, collected by Red Cross after the cord was cut, harbored pesticides, consumer product ingredients, and wastes from burning coal, gasoline, and garbage.
http://archive.ewg.org/reports/bodyburden2/execsumm.php
http://www.ens-newswire.com/ens/jul2005/2005-07-22-02.asp
"Chemical exposures during childhood can be far more harmful than those later in life
. Our cord blood findings above all raise the need for testing that ensures the safety of the widespread exposures we've documented that begin even before birth," Jane Houlihan, EWG's vice president for research, said.
"CDC is uniquely positioned and funded to respond to this need through its national body burden testing program, but CDC cannot test for all 80,000 industrial chemicals registered for use today," Houlihan said. "The companies that produce these chemicals have a responsibility to know if their products end up in babies, and to share what they learn with the public."
The American Chemistry Council, which represents the industry supports the biomonitoring studies, and agrees with the CDC's cautionary statement that the mere detection of a chemical does not necessarily indicate a risk to health.
"The information in the report should not be cause for undue concern," said the Council, "but a springboard for better understanding of exposure and - with more information - how the human body interacts with the environment."
The Third National Report on Human Exposure to Environmental Chemicals and an executive summary are available online at:
http://www.cdc.gov/exposurereport
http://www.ens-newswire.com/ens/jul2005/2005-07-22-02.asp
it starts to inform us -then it tells us not to be overly concerned? :eek:
so which is it? -see this is noninformation -read it yet do not worry we the government - we the CDC FDA -will tell you what to belive?