Anyone see this claim of a "cure" from this famed pastor?

[lurkingforacure]

Just saw this, am hoping it's true, wanted to share...here's the link...share your thoughts if you wish:

http://www.ocregister.com/articles/p...-cure-jannetta

[paula_w]

Haven't heard about it till now but i'm in pittsburgh for two more weeks so i'll see if i can find anything out. sounds like it's hush hush. Although not confirmed, they say it's this guy.....neurosurgeon..so here is more about him.

http://www.wpahs.org/AGH/neuro/jannetta/index.htm

i like this quote:
Our mission grows from a vision of the relationship between healthcare consumers and their care providers, and of the patient's rights in this relationship. We believe patients should be encouraged to participate actively as partners in their health care management team. The better informed the patient, the more likely it is that diagnosis will be timely and accurate, and treatment will be effective. Likewise, there is much truth in an old saying: an ounce of prevention (or early detection) is worth a pound of cure.


paula

Originally Posted by lurkingforacure

Just saw this, am hoping it's true, wanted to share...here's the link...share your thoughts if you wish:

http://www.ocregister.com/articles/p...-cure-jannetta

[made it up]

Believe it when I see it!

[paula_w]

agree! and will let them know what i think about false claims!

paula

Originally Posted by made it up

Believe it when I see it!

[ZucchiniFlower]

Neurology. 2000 Aug 22;55(4):565-9.

Transplantation of cultured human neuronal cells for patients with stroke.

Kondziolka D, Wechsler L, Goldstein S, Meltzer C, Thulborn KR, Gebel J, Jannetta P, DeCesare S, Elder EM, McGrogan M, Reitman MA, Bynum L.

Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, PA 15213, USA.

Transplantation of cultured neuronal cells is safe in animal models and improves motor and cognitive deficits in rats with stroke.

The authors studied the safety and feasibility of human neuronal cellular transplantation in patients with basal ganglia stroke and fixed motor deficits, including 12 patients (aged 44 to 75 years) with an infarct 6 months to 6 years previously (stable for at least 2 months).

Serial evaluations (12 to 18 months) showed no adverse cell-related serologic or imaging-defined effects. The total European Stroke Scale score improved in six patients (3 to 10 points), with a mean improvement 2.9 points in all patients (p = 0. 046).

Six of 11 PET scans at 6 months showed improved fluorodeoxyglucose uptake at the implant site. Neuronal transplantation is feasible in patients with motor infarction.

************************************************** ******************************************

INTERESTING BOOK:

INTERACTIONS BETWEEN TRANSPLANTED NEURAL STEM CELLS AND HOST TISSUE: A TWO-WAY STREET

http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&...BIuSs3-YoWN3NA

[lurkingforacure]

If Janetta's treatment consists of transplanted neuronal cells, isn't this what Dr. Michael Levesque did in 1999 for Dennis Turner, who testified before Congress in 2004 about it essentially putting his PD into remission? Or is it more like what Janetts has done for other disorders, the decompression treatment?

My readings about Janetta to date indicate that he is world-reknowned for at least one treatment that he invented that has to do with decompressing blood vessels that put pressure on nerves and thereby cause pain and twitches, etc. Once the pressure is off the nerve (by putting a "pad" between the blood vessel and nerve), the problem is solved. I am probably butchering what I have read but that is my understanding of it.

I was reluctant to post about this because of the false hope issue, and am sorry if anyone is offended by the thread. Everyone should be outraged when false claims of a cure are made, but at the same time, I'd rather be aware of the research work and risk dashed hopes than not know something could be coming which could really help. I really debated posting about this, but so much about this seems different from other news articles...such as the fact that this guy, instead of heralding his research work months or years in advance of any actual beneficial treatment coming to light, as almost everyone in this industry does (to get that stock value up, up, up?), has apparently been working quietly, behind the scenes, until now, baboom.

I'm going to hope and pray he's onto something that can really help.

And thinking ahead: what if his "cure" is a cumbersome treatment (like the GDNF surgery-a one-at-a-time treatment that defies vast commercialization) and which many parkies might not be able to afford (since it won't be medicare/medicaide approved for awhile, meanwhile the suffering continues unabated)-would the PD nonprofits out there be willing to turn at least some of those research dollars into payments for this surgery/treatment? Does anyone have thoughts about what the response to such a request might be?
I'd like to think that such would be included in the mission statements of the PD nonprofits...but no doubt feathers would be ruffled by such a request, no?